Istfg stop calling anti-pedophilia “purity culture” you fuckers don’t understand the meaning of words.
Stop calling fiction and artwork “pedophilia” you fuckers don’t understand the meaning of words.
Sexualizing fictional children is still sexualizing children:
If you’re getting off to a child, you’re by definition a pedophile.
Being against the sexualization of kids isn’t a bad thing idk wtf is wrong with you
(THIS IS ALSO ABOUT MAPS BTW WHO ARE PEDOPHILES WHO USE THIS SAME ARGUMENT)
Child characters and real actual human children have nothing in common.
Being attracted to a character in fiction doesn’t say anything about your irl attraction.
Just like people who are attracted to murderer characters aren’t automatically attracted to murderers irl.
Also you can portray the sexualization of children in fiction without intending for a reader to “get off” on it. Why are you assuming people only write or read about child abuse for sexual purposes?
Fictional children aren’t real children
They are fictional
We are allowed to do what we want with them
It doesn’t really matter
They are just toys for us to play with
In fictional murder, no one really dies; in fictional child porn, YOU STILL FUCKING DREW CHILD PORN.
Literally who else would consume that type of content other than people who find kids sexy????
Regardless of what your feelings are, fictional cp is still just as illegal as cp of real people.
It’s not child porn lol
Fictional children can’t be hurt lol
Fictional children are fictional
Fictional cp doesn’t exist
Friend, you are misreading the text.
It says it’s illegal to give obscenity to a minor, and clarifies that cartoons depicting minors havung sex etc counts as obscenity if you give it to a minor.
All this says is that giving porn to a minor is a crime which is already true.
Adults are allowed to look at dirty cartoons, children are not.
Discussion ¬