Origin of your alterhuman identity?
Entirely spiritual
Primarily spiritual, but partially psychological
An equal or unknown mix of spiritual and psychological
Primarily psychological, but partially spiritual
Entirely psychological
Origin is mostly or entirely unknown
I don’t care about the origin
Other origin (feel free to describe in the tags or reblogs)!
If you have more than one alterhuman identity, you can answer for the general collective or just one particular ID!
You’re mistaken.
I don’t avoid Nestle. I can’t afford to.
I just accept that it’s a moral compromise.
As you said there’s no ethical consumption under capitalism.
I simply accept that we are all ethically compromised.
I don’t believe that any given private citizen who does not have other human beings under there power is obligated to act in the most moral way possible every moment of every day.
We all make moral compromises.
Antis that call proshippers proshitters are hilarious because that’s like. Middle school level insult and actually think that proshippers are offended by it fjdjcjshfjajd
Creating or enjoying fan content of an adult character and a child character as a “ship” does not make you a pedophile.
Having uncontrollable attraction to real life children makes you a pedophile.
Creating or enjoying fan content of an adult character and a child character as a “ship” does not make you a child molester.
Sexually assaulting a real child makes you a child molester.
Calling people who create or enjoy fictional content “pedophiles” or “child molesters” waters down serious terminology.
There are lots of reasons to draw or write ship content of adult and child characters that are not because you’re a child molester or a pedophile.
Fiction is not real life.
The fact that you can’t see the difference between harming a child and creating fiction says more about you than it does about people who write and draw these things.
No.
Something being difficult for you to do doesn’t make it any less immoral, or any more moral.
Cheating on your spouse is immoral. Does it make it less immoral if it’s difficult for you to stop yourself from cheating on your spouse? No it does not.
Does it make it less immoral to kill someone, because it was more convenient to you to kill them? No it does not.
Avoiding Nestle products is difficult and inconvenient. It’s still immoral to buy them. If you know it’s immoral to buy them and you still choose to do so, you are compromising your morals when you do.
It’s difficult and inconvenient for some people to avoid buying the Harry Potter game. Autistic people with special interests. People who’ve been fans their whole lives and can’t help that the franchise was a big part of their life.
Avoiding the game is inconvenient to them.
Avoiding Nestle products is incontinent to you.
Morality is not based on what is convenient to you.
You are exactly as immoral for buying Nestle products as someone is for buying the Harry Potter game.
Does that make you uncomfortable? Does that make you feel icky? Does it make you feel like a bad person because you’ve been doing something immoral out of convenience while shaming and harassing other people for doing the exact same thing?
Good. It should.
If you know it’s immoral to buy Nestle products and you buy them anyway out of convenience then don’t you dare harass people for buying the Harry Potter game.
context link of post the ask refers to
context notes: we are transgender, we hate JKR, we are not buying or playing the hogwarts game.