( No Title )
The difference between me and antis is that I have my own internal sense of morality, so I know how to discern on my own whether or not a fictional action should be replicated.
If someone decides to attack and kill another person, that’s on nobody but the attacker. Blaming anything else absolves them of that responsibility. If you decide to hurt someone, did the fiction make you do that? Of course not. That’s on you.
Fiction can be a tool for explaining good morals, but that doesn’t mean fiction itself is always moral, and fiction doesn’t have to teach a moral to be good fiction.
Discussion ¬