( No Title )
Fictional characters cannot give or revoke consent regardless of whether they are portrayed as children or adults.
Characters cannot and do not consent to being written.
They do not and cannot consent to any of the traumatic or sexual situations that authors write them in.
The question of what characters are capable of consent is irrelevant in conversations about what fiction is acceptable.
“You shouldn’t write sexual content of that character because they are underage” is as meaningless as “you shouldn’t write torture content of that character because they are underage”.
You are a pedophile if you consume and jack off to any content of underage people in sexual situations, and it’s disturbing that you want to normalize this in any capacity. I think you should let the police check your hard drive and see what they think about it 🤔
antis stop misusing pedophile challenge: impossible
pedophile simply means “a person that experiences pedophilia, or a sexual attraction to pre-pubescent kids.”
“consume and jack off to any content of underage people in sexual situations” does not fall under that. most child rapists arent even pedophiles, and i say this as a pedophile who has been groomed as a child multiple times and was not abused by a pedophile at any point in my life.
if a person is not sexually attracted to pre-pubescent kids, that automatically means they CANT be a pedophile
Discussion ¬