( No Title )
It’s condescending to assume that a reader is too stupid to recognize when a character is doing something harmful or crossing a taboo in a piece of fiction.
It’s patronizing to believe that a reader will have their morals compromised by reading fiction and be reprogrammed by it to believe that the harmful action and crossing taboos is good in real life.
It’s ridiculous to act like people can’t read about characters harming others or crossing taboos in fiction without starting to believe it’s okay to harm people or cross taboos in real life.
It’s unrealistic to assume that you know what reason someone has for reading a piece of fiction in which harm occurs or taboos are crossed.
It’s disgusting and boundary crossing for you to speculate about and fixate on someone else’s’ sexual habits based on the fiction they consume.
Discussion ¬