angrylittlesliceofpizza:

blackheartbiohazards:

spellscarred:

blackheartbiohazards:

blackheartbiohazards:

“I don’t want to read this” is totally valid.

“This is disgusting to me” is totally valid.

“I don’t want to read this because it is disgusting to me” is totally valid.

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

Bro, blocking someone and then using their tag like this is, all offence, weak as fuck. Like all you had to say was, na bro I don’t promote pedo protags on this here blog, because I wholly agree with the premise of your argument given contexts (i.e., writing abusive relationships to show the evils, great; writing abusive relationships to show the romance, yikes).

This response is so, so comically shitty within the context of that tag, oh my god.

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

regular reminder that writing deeply unsetting things is:
– not condoning it. there are ways for the narrative to point out how f*cked up it is, and still explore what’s going on
– *a way that people who suffered these things in real life can cope*
– nearly the same thing: a way for people who suffered it and *don’t understand it yet* can come to terms with it

you don’t have to read any of all that. and you don’t have to understand this, or accept it. you can just admit that it’s not for you, and not for you to judge.
the most you can ask is for the Things to be tagged properly.