“I don’t want to read this because it is disgusting to me” is totally valid.
“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.
“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.
Bro, blocking someone and then using their tag like this is, all offence, weak as fuck. Like all you had to say was, na bro I don’t promote pedo protags on this here blog, because I wholly agree with the premise of your argument given contexts (i.e., writing abusive relationships to show the evils, great; writing abusive relationships to show the romance, yikes).
This response is so, so comically shitty within the context of that tag, oh my god.
“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.
Someone needs to man up here and say “actually, authoritarianism is sometimes good”.
There is a level of authoritarianism that is sometimes good.
Additionally, it is a distortion to whitewash a principle of abstract justice through the language of personal preference.
Wow, what the fuck. You’re really just gonna say “authoritarianism is good” without any shame, huh?
It’s the mask coming off lol. In the end anyone trying to police fiction, thought crimes, and what people do to their own bodies are trying to control others, the whole point is to control someone and they’re eventually going to admit to that bullshit
Well, they’re openly trad and pro-missionary on their blogs so that’s not surprising but this is a good example for self-proclaimed progressives and left-wingers with similar mindsets about fiction that these are their people. This is who they’re siding with and what their ideology is inherently tied with.
Discussion ¬