folgers-offical:

marshemillow:

ahallister:

blackheartbiohazards:

seaslugdisco:

blackheartbiohazards:

spellscarred:

blackheartbiohazards:

blackheartbiohazards:

“I don’t want to read this” is totally valid.

“This is disgusting to me” is totally valid.

“I don’t want to read this because it is disgusting to me” is totally valid.

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

Bro, blocking someone and then using their tag like this is, all offence, weak as fuck. Like all you had to say was, na bro I don’t promote pedo protags on this here blog, because I wholly agree with the premise of your argument given contexts (i.e., writing abusive relationships to show the evils, great; writing abusive relationships to show the romance, yikes).

This response is so, so comically shitty within the context of that tag, oh my god.

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

by responding with the same thing like this over and over, it does nothing but make the other people believe that you DO condone or even support things like pedophilia or abuse. just perhaps a reason to adjust your wording to something more agreeable, maybe try forming a counter argument or something 🙂

“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.

I want to be extra clear: when people write stuff about ‘pedophilia’, I automatically translate that as a dog whistle for ‘queer content’. Because that’s exactly what conservatives have done historically, are doing right now, and will likely keep doing for as long as it keeps fucking working on braindead purity bullshit morons.

“pls tell me this isnt an excuse for people to write <trans> fics again” is what I see, because when US Republicans see fiction with trans characters in it, they call that ‘grooming’, they call that ‘pedophilia’. So, in effect, that’s what you would end up banning: trans characters from media. Fuck that, fuck you, and fuck the lame horse you rode in on. You’re not welcome in my house if you’re going to support the conservative assault on queer media by giving them cover to remove our stories because of some bullshit ‘protect the children’ nonsense over *fiction*.

The reason why blackheart keeps responding like this is because that’s all they NEED to say. Censorship is authoritarian, no matter why you’re doing it.

YOU are the one who is assuming that because they support fiction, that must mean that he supports abuse in real life. That’s YOUR problem. Ain’t got nothing to do with us. They aren’t implicated by your assumption in the slightest. Maybe read what he said again if you’re gonna be a little pissbaby about shit they didn’t say. “How dare you say we piss on the poor” and all that.

Very sorry to op who probably cringes every time there’s a headass anti response to this post in their notifs

We’re shocked that there have been so few, comparatively! But yeah V_V