“I don’t want to read this because it is disgusting to me” is totally valid.
“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.
Friend, I have bad news for you, wanting to get rid of materials that sexualize dark topics is still censorship.
I’m anti censorship meaning anyone can publish or say what they want. It’s important to not shy away from certain topics to bring more awareness to them. Banning books and movies can be bad. It’s free speech. If I don’t like it I won’t read it. But there are some things that honestly are borderline illegal and made for a certain audience that I don’t think should be published or released. Ever.
“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.
Right, got it the first time.
Okay so me thinking a smut written by a pedophile for pedophiles shouldn’t be read or written because it disgusting to me is authoritarian.
Me thinking a book written by someone who supports incest for people who support incest should not be written or read because it is disgusting to me is authoritarian.
Me thinking a book promoting racism or nazi propaganda shouldn’t been written or read because it it disgusting to me is authoritarian.
I am an authoritarian for not wanting to read this and not want others to read or write this because I find it disgusting. I only think of myself and not the poor people who do want to read and spread this media around. Cool.
That’s censorship. That’s authoritarian.
You do not know why a person is read or writing a story.
“I don’t think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me” is authoritarian.
Discussion ¬