🔹 Adults who appear childlike to you are still capable of consent and deserving of sexual relationships.
🔹 Adults who are disabled are still capable of consent and deserving of sexual relationships.
🔹 Adults who act in a way you consider childlike are still capable of consent and deserving of sexual relationships.
🔹 Children with bodies that appear mature to you are still children.
🔹 Children who act in a way you consider mature are still children.
🔹 Conflating a body’s appearance, or a person’s personality, with whether or not it is okay to sexualize that person is ableist, stigmatizing, and predatory.
The “body age” argument that this person is making is scary.
You, and other people with petite, soft, or unlined bodies that some might consider “childlike” do not deserve to have your bodies stigmatized or be considered creepy for having sex.
Meanwhile, our body was extremely mature as a child, to the point that we were regularly mistaken for being 18 or 19 when we were 12 years old.
And it was not okay for us to be sexualized and preyed on when we were 12 just because our body looked “mature”.
The ideas that this post we’re discussing argue for are actively predatory toward children with more developed bodies, and are stigmatizing and marginalizing toward actual adults who are capable of consent.
Fancops are bullies. Fancops are like every other bully who calls someone weird as an insult.
“it’s bad to be weird, it’s good to be normal”– hey miss me with that ableist, transphobic, queerphobic fucking mindset.
…So it’s not normal to be attracted to Honey-senpai who is canonically 18-years-old. But it’s okay to be attracted to Ochako who is canonically 15-years-old?
I don’t think they even have their own argument right.
