( No Title )
“but they might have broken the law!!”
And?
Are you forgetting the “do crime” in “be gay, do crime” again today?
👉 “failed to fully comply with the law” does not mean “did something harmful or evil”.
👉 “fully complied with the law” does not mean “acted with compassion, justice, or mercy.”
Don’t fall back on legalism when you’re evaluating the goodness or badness of a person, idea, or organization.
sure yeah “be gay, do crime” means “you can be non-compliant with laws regarding irl child porn” & “you can publicly imply a volunteer you had beef with is disseminating child porn with no proof” why not 👍
“non-compliant with laws regarding child porn” here meaning “failed to sufficiently protect their organization from a literal outside attack on them that used child porn as a weapon.”
You are criminalizing a this organization’s failure to sufficiently protect itself from attack. If we were talking about a single person instead of an organization maybe you would see how victim-blamey this is.
Discussion ¬