and it’s doubly wild cuz in canon he’s a straight up pedophile. a pro contact pedophile too and it’s part fo why he killed the kids he killed. but then antis treat it like a cime to acknowledge this and develop this more in au’s. cuz as they’d pit it “”noo our favorite villain would be an anti and a good dad!” yes many try to insis ton good dad william somehow being possible despite how he treated mike and lizzie and let evan (crying child) be killed by mike and mike’s friends. like i’m not against people making au’s where the villain character isn’t always evil.
it’s just really grossly hypocritical coming from antis who otherwise don’t let people do this,. and are picky choosy about when its inherent abuse apologia to do this with certain villain characters. hell i’ve seen them call people pedos for liking other canon pedophile characters or pedophile coded characters to this degree. it’s pure arbitrary hypocrisy where antis think only they shouldn’t be bullied for woobifying an atrocious villain.
i know this is a big thing in anti spaces in the fnaf fandom cuz i saw what my two alters witnessed when they were still defending antis. and once again makes it look liek anti activism IS just about moralized harassment and concern trollikng.
“ #wait that’s canon? i thought it was just a popular hc#i’m not 100% caught up on the lore “ yes these things are all canon. they have been for awhile. golden freddy did the bite of 87 on evan. caused b y mike and his friends bullying evan till it killed him. not foxy etc. i know a lot of people take matpat’s word on the lore as gospel but that’s not the best wya to grasp the series’ canon lore.
especially since he’s still in denial that golden freddy did the bite of 87 not foxy. and has weird understandings of how brain damage to the frontal lobe works in minors compared to adults. someoneneeds to tell matpat that a minor under 12 getting their frontal lobe severely and permanently damaged will appear differently than that happening to someone old enough to be a security guard.
Discussion ¬