BlackHeart Biohazards

demongender-vibes:

crash-or-cringe:

demongender-vibes:

crash-or-cringe:

blackheart-biohazards:

Proshippers are the ones with normal attitudes toward fiction.

I don’t know how to explain to antis that they are not normal for getting themselves all twisted up and panicked about the moral lives of, and harm done to, fictional characters.

Antis, nobody cares but you.

It’s not important to be normal, but it’s absolutely normal to not care that people write about bad things and taboo topics.

Policing what other people write and draw and obsessing over other people’s morals is not normal.

Antis arent allowed to any show with violence or precarious situations anymore which removes most anime, and any horror films. Sorry, obviously the people who wrote demon slayer are sick and twisted and you cant have them anymore its all mine now.

i’ve actually seen antis trying to do that recently too. trying to get rid of any books with violence in them from their bookshelf. i don’t remember the url of which tumblr user talked about it anymore but. not too long ago, probs last  year, an anti on twitter made a super long post calling out any authors whoever wrote about violence.

at least the ones they were aware of. it was ridiculous how long the post was. and a lot of people rightfully clowned on them for it. hopefully someone who follows me still has a link to that. i’m pretty sure it was something that went down on twitter first.

holy shit.

can confirm. There’s at least one tiktok of a lady tossing books from her shelf; and the sheer dystopian censorship flashbacks it gave me were head spinning

fucking yikes. that does sound really awful. amazing how antis said they’d be reasonable enough to not cause this exact thing with their activism. AND YET. not only have they done what they said they wouldn’t. they went and did worse pro censorship takes too.

worstofantis:

fatboytitty:

fatboytitty:

fatboytitty:

fatboytitty:

fatboytitty:

We really gotta realize on a large scale that the “brain is finished developing at 25″ is not just a misconception, it’s a deliberate lie that is being spread to attack young people, take their rights away and justify the abuse they are constantly targeted by as a feature of our society, not a bug. And to see queer people parrot this bullshit to win internet arguments with 16y/os while it’s being used to make hrt illegal for people under 25 is, and I don’t say this lightly, nazbols trying to pass as leftists levels of intellectual dishonesty.

Like I am pissed and bitchy right now, but with every fiber of my heart I mean it, if you perpetuate the idea of the “fully developed brain” you are complicit in child abuse, wether you know it or not.

Reviews are in:

Hey, tumblr queers.

This concerns you.

You may not care about youth rights, but unless you want it to be illegal to be openly queer around people below their 20s, this concerns you!

You may not care about paraphiles, or the conflation of pedophilia and abuse but unless you want queerness to be outlawed on the grounds of being deviant sexuality, because we are letting the idea of some sexuality as inherently abusive float around, this concerns you!

If you want queer rights you will have to get your hands dirty and think about youth oppression and putitanism as it affects the perception of paraphilias and understand that they’re problems that will get us killed, too.

This op: hey I want to remind everyone about this real scientific fact that brains don’t ever stop developing and of misinformation that is used to create legislation/policy that is constricting youth rights!

Antis/puritans/whatever the fuck these people are: you’re a pedophile

??????????

Anyway these responses are disgusting! Worst of!

unexaggerateddumbass:

melonsaway:

xirlos:

trans-mom:

trans-mom:

“You wearing a collar in public is bad cuz I didn’t consent” you wearing a bracelet in public is bad cuz I didn’t consent to it.

Yall don’t really have a right to consent to other peoples clothes.

What’s next? Boys aren’t allowed to wear dresses cuz conservatives don’t “consent?” Trans people don’t get to wear gender affirming clothes cuz people don’t “consent?” Women don’t get to wear pants anymore cuz you don’t “consent?”

“Wearing a collar is sexual!” OK and? There are people that get off wearing certain clothes, are you going to restrict what men and women are allowed to wear by deciding those clothes are inherently sexual?

You ignore parents abusing their kids in grocery stores, you ignore the homeless people begging for money, you can ignore the gay people in collars and stuff.

“Isn’t it weird to wear a collar in public to show you belong to someone?” You wear a wedding ring, your husband doesn’t. A catholic priest wears a clerical collar, does God?

And even if it is weird, good! I’m weird! My gender is a weird little ball of goo! And I don’t care if you find me weird!

I’ve heard anti-trans campaigners make the case that, because trans women are “perverts” who are constantly aroused by wearing women’s clothing in their eyes, our very presence in public spaces is tantamount to a “nonconsensual” sexual act that ropes in anyone we encounter. I’ve heard similar claims that people who wear a BDSM collar or an item of fetishwear in public are “nonconsensually” involving other people in their kink or scene. I must point out that these assertions are but a small step away from me claiming that people who publicly wear wedding rings are “nonconsensually” involving me in their relationships. Or claiming that women who wear short skirts are “nonconsensually” exposing me to their “sexual” bodies. Oh, wait, people actually do say that last one, sometimes to compel the woman to cover herself up, other times to invoke the victim-blaming trope “she was asking for it.”

-Julia Serano in Sexed Up

She goes way more in depth into this idea, as well as the broader way that the stigmatization of sex can harm queer people(and everyone, really). It’s a book that I highly recommend to anyone with the bandwidth for some theory.