😈 You are allowed to have evil characters who are not punished by the narrative by the end of the story.
😈 You are allowed to have evil characters who win.
😈 You are allowed to have evil characters who make evil look fun and cool.
😈 You are allowed to make your fun, cool evil character the protagonist.
😈 You are allowed to glorify, romanticize and eroticize evil characters and villainous acts.
😈 You are not obligated to teach your audience a moral lesson.
😈 You are allowed to slap it,
only once.
In all seriousness, as evidenced by the original tags on this post:
This post is meant to conflate writing “proship” fanfiction to rebellion against societal concepts that lead to the creation of the Hays Code (which, by the way, regulated film, not literature).
In fact, literature involving power dynamics within romantic relationships has been on the rise. “BookTok”, a trend of certain kinds of romantic novels being heavily advertised on TikTok, has frequently pushed novels involving power dynamics, such as having a relationship with your employer, or a mob boss. This trend has been so prominent as to have dedicated sections in retailers such as Barnes and Noble. “Fifty Shades of Grey”set records as the fastest-selling paperback in the United Kingdom.
There is no large, active, cultural / political attack on the fanfiction (or published fiction) championed under the “proship” label. There have been no political movements with momentum within the US to crack down on literature romanticizing incest, csa, or abuse.
As far as the Hays Code goes, the sympathy from writers and the general audience towards villains has been quite high for a while now, with films such as Maleficent and Cruella seeking to humanize popular villains previously shown in an unsympathetic light. Films featuring morally dubious protagonists, such as The Suicide Squad, are also fairly popular and recieve large marketing and merchandising pushes from their publishers (Warner Bros., In this case).
The ideology behind the Hays Code is associated with US Conservatives, and yet relatively little pushback from conservative groups has been seen concerning these media trends. What has been seen is a political push against literature with gay or trans themes, sex education topics, and which tackles the history of race & white supremacy in the US. A library in Llano County of Texas has threatened to cease operations after being ordered to return books which were illegally removed without notice, such as “They Called Themselves the K.K.K.: The Birth of an American Terrorist Group.”
When you see posts like these, consider whether the OP is talking about a form of censorship which exists in reality, or whether they may have run into someone who didn’t like their fanfiction on AO3, and spun a narrative for themselves.
Nah fam, this is about the kids on this app telling others to kill themselves over fictional content and harming actual SA survivors via watering down terms like pedophilia.
As an artist from the country that coined the term “degenerate art”: This is ufortunately way too familiar and I’d suggest looking into (art) history (lmk if i can provide ressources, happy to help!).
Side note: There’s a difference between causing discomfort and actually harming someone. Most antis don’t see this, but i hope you do.
Fiction, on its own, can’t harm. It can be _used_ to harm (but there has to be an intention behind that), or it can be viewed by people whose parents didn’t teach them media literacy. Which is why we say:
If you see content that makes you u uncomfortable, you have to simply use the block button. The internet is not your safe space.
“I’m not trying to ban books, I’m trying to ban gross fanfiction”
Are you hearing yourself?
Im here to remind you, that AO3 was banned in our country 🥴
“ There have been no political movements with momentum within the US to crack down on literature romanticizing incest, csa, or abuse.”
“ The ideology behind the Hays Code is associated with US Conservatives, and yet relatively little pushback from conservative groups has been seen concerning these media trends. What has been seen is a political push against literature with gay or trans themes, sex education topics, and which tackles the history of race & white supremacy in the US. “
the “evidence” being used to support these book bans is that these books are “grooming” kids you absolute fucking dingus:
These groups share lists of books to challenge, and they employ tactics such as swarming school board meetings, demanding newfangled rating systems for libraries, using inflammatory language about “grooming” and “pornography,” and even filing criminal complaints against school officials, teachers, and librarians. The majority of these groups appear to have formed in 2021, and many of the banned books counted by PEN America can be linked in some way to their activities. Some of the groups espouse Christian nationalist political views, while many have mission statements oriented toward reforming public schools, in some cases to offer more religious education. In at least a few documented cases (for example, in Texas, Florida, and Pennsylvania), the individuals lodging complaints about books did not have children attending public schools when at the time they raised objections.
And here’s 7 of the top 10 most banned books of 2021 per the American Library Association, with the reasons they were challenged:
Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe Reasons: Banned, challenged, and restricted for LGBTQIA+ content, and because it was considered to have sexually explicit images
Lawn Boy by Jonathan Evison Reasons: Banned and challenged for LGBTQIA+ content and because it was considered to be sexually explicit
All Boys Aren’t Blue by George M. Johnson Reasons: Banned and challenged for LGBTQIA+ content, profanity, and because it was considered to be sexually explicit
Out of Darkness by Ashley Hope Perez Reasons: Banned, challenged, and restricted for depictions of abuse and because it was considered to be sexually explicit
Me and Earl and the Dying Girl by Jesse Andrews Reasons: Banned and challenged because it was considered sexually explicit and degrading to women
The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison Reasons: Banned and challenged because it depicts child sexual abuse and was considered sexually explicit
Beyond Magenta by Susan Kuklin Reasons: Banned and challenged for LGBTQIA+ content and because it was considered to be sexually explicit.
Discussion ¬