“You wearing a collar in public is bad cuz I didn’t consent” you wearing a bracelet in public is bad cuz I didn’t consent to it.
Yall don’t really have a right to consent to other peoples clothes.
What’s next? Boys aren’t allowed to wear dresses cuz conservatives don’t “consent?” Trans people don’t get to wear gender affirming clothes cuz people don’t “consent?” Women don’t get to wear pants anymore cuz you don’t “consent?”
“Wearing a collar is sexual!” OK and? There are people that get off wearing certain clothes, are you going to restrict what men and women are allowed to wear by deciding those clothes are inherently sexual?
You ignore parents abusing their kids in grocery stores, you ignore the homeless people begging for money, you can ignore the gay people in collars and stuff.
“Isn’t it weird to wear a collar in public to show you belong to someone?” You wear a wedding ring, your husband doesn’t. A catholic priest wears a clerical collar, does God?
If villains are bad, why are they the ones usually fighting to change a broken system why the ‘heroes’ are fighting to maintain the status quo? 🤔
I’m evil and bad and a villain, and that’s great and it makes me happy.
The point at which you realize the entire antiship argument is one big motte-and-bailey fallacy. Your unironic belief is hard to defend (”consuming fiction with elements that are immoral in a real life context causes you to imitate those elements, eroding your own morals”) so you fall back on a position that’s much less controversial and easy to defend (”We’re just anti grooming // abuse // pedophilia // incest // etc.”), but unrelated to the actual point at hand, and act as if those two statements are the same thing.
He committed war crimes? I’m kissing him on the mouth.