The more I run this blog, the less hope I have of ever having productive conversations with antis due to how often they operate under completely different definitions.
legal terms have been twisted over this discourse, and they don’t even seem to care. They spread misinformation that hurts abused children. (Actual abused children. Because I have to specify that.)
I think if you can’t win an argument without rewriting the dictionary to do it, then you aren’t worthy of hearing out.
If you deliberately misuse words for purity points, then fuck you I’m afraid.
Alfred sits beside the steel and glass machine where his sister’s body has been sleeping for so long.
Inside him, she is awake; he hears her voice and they are a part of one another. Still, there is a comfort to being near her physical shell as it slumbers and changes
He reads to her, sometimes, or brings a radio, and sings, or speaks to her about meaningless things.
He puts his hand on the glass and sees his reflection inside.
Will they still be alike when she wakes up?
She has promised him that they will.
His reflection smiles.

No dawn, no day, I’m always in this twilight
In the shadow of your heart
–Florence & the Machine, Cosmic Love
Science can’t prove or disprove that people experience even one identity, to be fair.
There ARE studies about endogenic plurality in the works however, sysmeds don’t like to acknowledge them.
Personally, when it comes to the experience of identity, I trust people when they tell me what they’re experiencing.
Feel free to reply to this if you’re a mutual but I’m turning off reblogs preemptively because this is not a syscourse blog.

Toko spends days at the front self shipping and writing spicy fanfiction, and the second I come back to the front, discourse breaks out. V_V
Smh how is that fair??? 😂😂😂