real freedom includes the right to be a fucked-up dysfunctional weirdo. when you lack this right, your inability or refusal to comply with social norms will be used as a pretext to take away your other freedoms. all of us are fucked-up weirdos on the inside, so with sufficiently hostile and intrusive surveillance anyone can be unpersoned.
Fucked-up dysfunctional weirdo with full rights to and supports available to ensure whatever needs can be functionally met and are desired by said weirdo are filled.
If you don’t support the rights of kooks, weirdos, freaks, oddballs, and funky fellows then get out.
The pathologization and criminalization of pecularity doesn’t only affect the neurodivergent and the mentally ill, it can and will be used by the state against “normal” people the moment they step out of line.
Not only is it good to support the rights of freaks and weirdos on the grounds of protecting the rights of the neurodivergent and mentally ill, it’s also good on the grounds of cutting off a vector of state repression against the general public.
As soon as you start deeming it acceptable to take away the basic rights of “freaks”, you open the door to being deemed a “freak” yourself as soon as those in power decide you’re inconvenient.
Throwing “weirder” people under the bus will never guarantee you safety. You gotta park the bus so it stops running people over in general.
This is why the right to privacy is so, so crucial.
“Why can’t we enhance the surveillance state? Do you have something to hide?”
Maybe I just like being my best, weirdest self without you looking at me. Let live our best lives by leaving us the fuck alone. Live and let live. Mind your business and I’ll mind mine.
Why are antis are only reporting proshippers to the FBI?
Why not try reporting proshippers to:
- The KGB?
- The Comics Code Authority?
- The Disney Legal Department?
- The ESRB?
- The Ministry of Love?
- The School Principal?
- The Jedi Council?
Dude, it’s called an analogy. Have you ever heard of one? Would you have prefered I use a fictional murderer to make my example? Way to miss the fucking point.
Genuinely, I am literally asking for real here; Why the fuck would a real murderer care if murder is in fiction or not? It makes no difference to them either way.
Unless we’re going the anti route, then it does matter; A real murderer would not want murder to be portrayed in fiction, because then people in real life aren’t allowed to explore the topic, making it easier to fly under the radar.
Huh. I wonder who that sounds like. I guess we’ll never know.
πΆ & π for whoever you feel like answering for?
Well @redwingedwolves , since the actual ask got hilariously busted I’m answering this here.
As I was trying to say I was on a roll with Otto and Norman soooooo…
πΆ Does your F/O pursue you initially, or do you pursue your F/O?
I’m pretty much the pursuer in all my relationships. ^^ it’s not that I don’t like to be pursued, it’s that I know what I want.
With Norman it started with wanting his attention all the time, and then once I learned about the Goblin that was another way I thought I could connect with him, so I pursued him through that avenue too.
With Otto, he started taking care of me while dad was gone and I ended up with a crush π₯°
π Has your F/O ever done something heroic, or directly against their villainous nature? What caused it, and how did you both feel about it?
Otto does heroic stuff like nigh constantly. Saving people’s lives. Saving his enemies lives! He’s a big softy! One time he even spent like, months trying to cure cancer.
Norman can be pretty heroic too sometimes, but while Otto is super noble minded and magnanimous, daddy usually has a lot on his mind when he’s not in a frenzy, so heroism comes up less. That’s not to say never!


