Hi again.🙂I knew someone who claims to be anti censorship but thinks that a certain kind of humor (making fun of stereotype characters) shouldn´t exist and that if you´re okay with this kind of humor (or god forbid, laugh about it) you´re a bad person.🙄 What do you think about this? I think it´s pretty hypocritical.
I very much understand a person not wanting to support speech that they feel is hate-speech (racist, transphobic, homophobic jokes), and it is true that stand up comedy/telling jokes is a little different than creating fiction.
However, if you believe in free speech, as we do, you can not believe that it’s okay to censor these types of jokes either.
Because then we get into the authoritarian question of “who is doing the censorship?”.
If we censor people from making jokes on the basis that they are “homophobic”, it is entirely likely that these rules will actually be used to stop queer people from telling jokes about themselves, as much or more than it will censor actual homophobia.
I do not trust anyone with the power to enforce censorship with the power of censorship.
That said, like every other form of content, I think that comedy should ideally come with content warnings (or a deliberate lack of content warnings a la AO3’s “chose not to warn”).
If a performer is making homophobic, transphobic or racist jokes, I want a warning so I can make the decision to listen or avoid it as is my personal preference.
I think it should also be obvious that not everyone is considers the same material offensive or ‘ist’. There are plenty of queer comedians who make jokes that some might consider homophobic, but some might see as relatable or funny.
There are also plenty of jokes that simply age out of their original context and seem much more tasteless now than when they were originally created.
There are lots of reasons to laugh at a joke, shock, surprising, relating to it. You don’t know that someone laughing at a tasteless or ‘ist’ joke is laughing because they’re ‘ist’.
However, it’s also important to remember that there are some things people call “censorship” that really aren’t.
- A specific person or company refusing to broadcast or promote your content is not censorship
- A person being offended by your content or publicly disagreeing with your content is not censorship (it can be harassment, if the person is being uncivil.)
- A person choosing to avoid your content is not censorship
- A person choosing to avoid people who enjoy your content is not censorship
Telling jokes in bad taste is not, and should not be criminal, and should not be censored. But nobody has to laugh at them either.
I don’t think laughing at tasteless jokes makes you a bad person, but I don’t think wanting to avoid jokes that you find hurtful makes you a bad person either.
Discussion ¬