animentality:
Comment
Posts Tagged media analysis
140 results.
gemsandjunk: gemsandjunk: Everyone is nostalgic and no one is sincere. Do you get the idea Reboots made by people that don’t respect what they’re rebooting. Punching down before buzz feed listicles punch first. Isn’t it weird that the princess married[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
It’s always okay to use the fiction you write or read to explore negative feelings, experiences, and topics. Stories don’t have to be uplifting or happy, characters don’t have to be virtuous or admirable or relatable. And it’s still okay[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
“I don’t want to read this” is totally valid. “This is disgusting to me” is totally valid. “I don’t want to read this because it is disgusting to me” is totally valid. “I don’t think anyone should be allowed to[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
Let’s talk about how to think about the artistic merit inherent in smut and pornography. Smut and porn have the same amount of artistic merit and worthiness as every other kind of fiction, and can be interrogated in the same[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
elodieunderglass: fozmeadows: elodieunderglass: canadianwheatpirates: elodieunderglass: changes and trends in horror-genre films are linked to the anxieties of the culture in its time and place. Vampires are the manifestation of grappling with sexuality; aliens, of foreign influence. Horror from the Cold[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
“Critical” does not automatically mean “negative.” Thinking critically about something is not the same as (colloquially) criticizing it. “Thinking critically” on a piece of media does not mean deciding that you know all the “bad” elements of it and that[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
northern-punk-lad: Important reminder all villains are Antagonist but not all Antagonist are villains This is villain protagonist erasure.
funkypoacher: thecourtshrieker: suilesbianpoasts: apparently no one was paying attention in middle school language arts when we learned what a fucking protagonist was #while we’re at it the author is not the narrator or the protagonist either now THIS one louder[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
You did not write to much at all. Thank you so much for putting it out there, you are so right. It’s good to know some people out there get it! context link
faustandfurious: Basic rules for analysing fiction, an incomprehensive list jotted down in a hurry: The protagonist isn’t always right The protagonist isn’t always good The protagonist isn’t always written to be relatable or likeable The narrator isn’t always right The[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
faustandfurious: Basic rules for analysing fiction, an incomprehensive list jotted down in a hurry: The protagonist isn’t always right The protagonist isn’t always good The protagonist isn’t always written to be relatable or likeable The narrator isn’t always right The[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
Toko talks up and arguably romanticizes Byakuya’s qualities in the same manner that Watson talks up and arguably romanticizes Holmes qualities. (ie: both writers characterize their detective as cold, unfeeling, inhuman — despite clear action and evidence to the contrary–[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
Toko talks up and arguably romanticizes Byakuya’s qualities in the same manner that Watson talks up and arguably romanticizes Holmes qualities. (ie: both writers characterize their detective as cold, unfeeling, inhuman – despite clear action and evidence to the contrary–[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
evayna: Violet Beauregarde should‘ve won Wonka’s chocolate factory Have I watched the movie in the last decade or more? No.Do I have iron clad evidence to support my argument? Yes. 1. She’s the most knowledgeable about candy. She’s committed to[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
evayna: Have I watched the movie in the last decade or more? No.Do I have iron clad evidence to support my argument? Yes. 1. She’s the most knowledgeable about candy. She’s committed to it, and knows her stuff. When Wonka[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
mllecosettefauchelevent: moonshinemagpie: mllecosettefauchelevent: “Authors should not be ALLOWED to write about–” you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative “This book should be taken off of shelves for featuring–” you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative “Schools shouldn’t teach[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
cam1lla: moonshinemagpie: cam1lla: “Authors should not be ALLOWED to write about–” you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative “This book should be taken off of shelves for featuring–” you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative “Schools shouldn’t teach[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
bloodraven55: bloodraven55: it never fails to surprise me how some people will simply take every single thing in a story at face value and assume that what the characters are saying or doing or thinking must always be true even[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
bloodraven55: bloodraven55: it never fails to surprise me how some people will simply take every single thing in a story at face value and assume that what the characters are saying or doing or thinking must always be true even[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
Hey friend. I’m sorry you’re feeling so rough about this. I can definitely understand the source of your discomfort — it’s never fun to feel like you’re doing something that other people are vocally complaining about. But I do think[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
Hey friend. I’m sorry you’re feeling so rough about this. I can definitely understand the source of your discomfort – it’s never fun to feel like you’re doing something that other people are vocally complaining about. But I do think[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
fungi-maestro: Hm. Your interpretation of this character displeases me. Guards! Take them away! Make them read the source material once more, and if that fails, the stocks. darkheart-despairs https://ift.tt/cXesZIo
fungi-maestro: Hm. Your interpretation of this character displeases me. Guards! Take them away! Make them read the source material once more, and if that fails, the stocks.
feathery-dickmuffins: I talked about this once before but didn’t tag it back then because I didn’t know that the manga had a fanbase here. But anyway what I find incredibly wild about commentaries on, reviews, analyses, whatever of Monster is[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
feathery-dickmuffins-deactivate: I talked about this once before but didn’t tag it back then because I didn’t know that the manga had a fanbase here. But anyway what I find incredibly wild about commentaries on, reviews, analyses, whatever of Monster is[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
silvergryphon: faustandfurious: Basic rules for analysing fiction, an incomprehensive list jotted down in a hurry: The protagonist isn’t always right The protagonist isn’t always good The protagonist isn’t always written to be relatable or likeable The narrator isn’t always right[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
⭐ censorship is not when someone says “hey this piece of media sucks.” ⭐ censorship is not when someone says “hey this piece of media sucks so I suggest you avoid it.” ⭐ censorship is when someone says “hey this[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
Something is only “censorship” when someone (a government, a library, a media platform, etc) refuses to allow people access to the piece of media in question. 👉 A person, or a collection of people choosing to avoid a piece of[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
The irony is that Bella actually wields a lot of personal agency in Twilight, she just doesn’t use it in socially approved Strong Female Character ™️ways. Sending love, anon, sorry your parent was like that. Source: xxblackheartbiohazardsxx
maid-of-timey-wimey: anneofgreengaybles: july-19th-club: gracklesong: These objections are based on an imagined state of childhood in which all children live in a safe little bubble which does not burst until some sort of maturity threshold has been reached. One child’s distress[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
People who insist there is only one possible way to interpret a piece of media suck and are wrong no matter what idea they are trying to push on you. There is no one true interpretation. There is only the[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
That’s so sad to see. :C Source: xxblackheartbiohazardsxx
oneangstymotherfucker: Tw for vague csa/abuse mention Sometimes, yeah, I “get off to” the fics I write. And I definately like hearing that other people enjoy them, because I think everyone deserves things they enjoy and it truly makes me happy[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
what the fuck. Source: xxblackheartbiohazardsxx
noirandchocolate: All the Champions’ demises at the Blights’ hands are tragic, but Mipha’s is forever the one that fucks me up the most when we play BotW because out of the group she is the only one that, one hundred[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
🤔 Did you feel the tags and summary described the work accurately? What, if anything, would you change to improve my tagging and summary? 🤔 How would you describe the main themes and ideas of my work? What elements of[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
🗨️ What justifies the existence of creative works of art or fiction? 🗨️ Can creative works be separated categorically into “legitimate artwork” vs “obscenity/pornography”? 🗨️ Do obscene and pornographic creative works have a right to exist? 🗨️ How does one[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
We have never seen happy sugar life, but this seems like really interesting analysis! Maybe we will put it on our to-watch list.
disgruntled-foreign-patriarch: fictionadventurer: Pop culture reduces It’s a Wonderful Life to that last half hour, and thinks the whole thing is about this guy traveling to an alternate universe where he doesn’t exist and a little girl saying, “Every time a[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…