Anon. I cannot begin to explain to you how draconian Japanese anti-pornography laws are and have been for some time. Porn of any kind is kind of sort of illegal in Japan– in the same way “obscene material” is kind[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
piterelizabethdevries: I’ve been re-listening to The Protomen the last couple of days, they continue to be perfect. But there’s something I don’t get… how come their music is legal? Like, I would have expected bullshit copyright laws to keep them[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
exigencelost: exigencelost: really really not enough people in the united states understand that the reason there is a free breakfast and lunch program in US schools is because of the Black Panther Party’s Breakfast for Children program. it’s so important[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
pizzaback: pizzaback: pizzaback: do people earnestly think that an independent artist would have a chance in hell if they decided to sue a media corporation if said corporation plagarized their artistic work? be realistic hey remember when hot topic and[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
ubernegro: West Virginia bill makes trans existence as a crime New WV Obscenity Bill Would Jail People For “Transgender Exposure” To Minors If your existence is a felony, then everything is permitted. Go forth and raise hell.
Shockingly enough: Being a pedophile is not actually a crime “condoning” pedophilia is not a crime pedophilia is not a synonym for child molestation, rape, or sexual assault. proshipper means fiction only; the term proship does not in any way[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
Lolisho content of a sexual nature is dubiously legal in the United States. Do you want to know why? Because all “pornography” is dubiously legal in the United States. The USA is a complex web of “Obscenity” laws which vary[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
badmrkitty: Antis are apparently reporting proshippers to the FBI, which is absolutely ridiculous for obvious reasons, but how US centric is that? They see me playing barbies with the blorbos and immediately assume I’m dry-humping the constitution like the rest[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
Speaking exclusively with regard to US law: I, an adult, am legally allowed to write whatever I damn well please. If I write sexual content, you, a child, are not legally allowed to look at it. Therefore my “pedophilic content”[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
covington-shenanigans: : : By the way legislators aren’t making laws specifically targeting the LGBTQ community because of pansexuals or trans people without dysphoria or aces and aros. They’re doing it because they hate queer people, and want to make us[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
marshemillow: I sincerely doubt it, but I understand the worry. Here’s the thing; Old conservative Jack Thompson types are so much more influential than these internet harpies. They’ve been campaigning to make violent video games and other fictional content illegal[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
Unless the drawing was photorealistic, it more than likely was not illegal under US law. I just double checked, and yes, shadman was arrested. For assault with a deadly weapon, not for drawing gross or fucked up cartoons in bad[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…
Why get into the serious world of political advocacy when what you really want is an excuse to be mean and nasty to people online?
It’s illegal if it’s visual material indistinguishable from a photograph of a real child. As far as I’m aware there has been no case where written fiction about a living minor has been prosecuted in the United states. Again, I[…]↓ Read the rest of this entry…